Priority 2 · Develop programs
Arizona
A documented CTE program, funding mechanism, or pathway supports targeted development; the current buyer and budget still need qualification.
Documented state signal
Funding mechanism reviewed
An established program, statute, pathway, or outcome signal supports research. It does not establish an open purchasing opportunity.
The CTE State Priority grant formula uses prior CTE enrollment for 75% of the allocation and related placements for 25%. The state publishes budget and allowable-expense guidance alongside Perkins resources.
Undated program guidance; reviewed September 12, 2026
Workforce needs → Pearson solutions
Digital skills for learning and work · Access to employer-aligned occupational training
State-specific evidence with direct product matches, limitations and proposed measures.
Open the workforce crosswalk →Policy implementation questions & Pearson product fit
Placement-linked planning
Amber · Needs assessment requiredThese are explicit needs to investigate, not confirmed deficits. State policy evidence and proposed product fit are shown separately.
- Career readiness gap to validate
- Where does participation fail to translate into a relevant next step?
- CTE delivery gap to validate
- Which approved CTE programs need course or practice support?
- Workforce alignment gap to validate
- What do placement records and employers reveal about skill preparation?
Potential Pearson matches
- eDynamic Learning — Digital Curriculum
- eDynamic Learning — Knowledge Matters
College credit + career pathways
Arizona dual enrollment guidance
The state explains dual high-school and college credit, school-specific course availability, and transfer planning.
Dual enrollment: evidence, gaps & resources →College & district relationships
From policy to participating institutions
1 curated partnership/program record in this state. Source dates and open questions travel with each example.
Explore college & district partnerships →Proposed commercial next step
Connect an approved CTE program and placement goal to the district's actual grant budget.
This action is an analytical recommendation, not a reported Pearson plan.