← Louisiana map workspace

Priority 2 · Develop programs

Louisiana

A documented CTE program, funding mechanism, or pathway supports targeted development; the current buyer and budget still need qualification.

State policy · June 2023 version linked by Regents · Reviewed 2026-09-12

Louisiana dual enrollment · Policy 2.22

Find college & district partners in this state →
Human-reviewed decisions

This is a research baseline for discussion. Product fit, pursuit decisions and funding eligibility require responsible human validation. No state priority changed because of this screen.

Program source checked

Documented initiative

Regents Policy 2.22, revised June 2023 and linked from its current dual-enrollment page, permits campus, high-school, online and hybrid delivery. Traditional credit is applied to both transcripts; Choice credit is applied to the college transcript at the student’s election. Identical content and rigor expectations apply.

Official program source ↗

Regents dual-enrollment policy directory ↗

Funding & student cost

The retrieved policy establishes delivery and academic requirements, not a currently available funding allocation. Confirm tuition, materials and the paying party in the local agreement.

Online route documented

Virtual delivery

Online and hybrid delivery are explicitly permitted in the cited policy. Confirm the college, instructor and credit modality for the selected course.

Credit and credentials

Confirm the transcript-issuing college, high-school equivalency and applicability to the student’s intended college award. An industry credential requires its own assessment and issuer; a digital badge is not automatically college credit.

Explicit gap to resolve

Use Policy 2.22 to verify the course’s Traditional or Choice credit modality, qualified instruction and transcript treatment. Identify a current paying party before proposing a Pearson-supported pathway.

Analytical next step—not a claim that the state lacks a program or that Pearson has an approved solution.

Candidate Pearson resources & validation

College-credit coursework

Pearson’s online dual-enrollment offering is a candidate for a college partnership. Product and the college must confirm course equivalency, faculty, transcript, transfer and state eligibility.

Pearson dual enrollment ↗

Exploration, preparation & credentials

Evaluate eDynamic Learning curriculum and simulations for preparation; evaluate Certiport for relevant credential assessments and Credly for credential communication. These roles are separate from awarding academic college credit.

State gaps & Pearson product crosswalk →
People, deliverables & measures

Proposed responsibilities for human review—not assigned Pearson staffing or commitments.

  • Government Affairs + college partner: current agreement, allowable funding, approved delivery and policy interpretation.
  • Product + Research + faculty: course crosswalk, evidence, qualified instruction and assessment requirements.
  • Sales + district buyer: documented need, available budget, decision-maker and purchasing window.
  • Implementation + counselor + student-support lead: enrollment workflow, coaching, accessibility, broadband and lab plan; measure staff time rather than adding untracked administrative work.

Track enrollment-to-completion, applicable college credits, credential attainment, subgroup access and persistence. For commercial readiness, require buyer commitments, budget evidence and a dated next step before changing the forecast.

Start with Louisiana dual enrollment · Policy 2.22 ↗