Registered representation, advertised responsibilities, and the questions to validate inside Pearson.
A documented baseline, with clear limits.
Initial review of ten Priority 1 states; counts cover matched Pearson-named clients, not an exhaustive audit of all affiliates or employees. Lobbyist registration does not establish an employee relationship, CTE assignment, access to a legislator, or revenue opportunity.
Priority 1 states first
Four states have verified individual counts within matched client records. Indiana has a dated firm listing. Two searches found no Pearson-named match, and three remain unresolved. These evidence colors are independent of the map’s opportunity tiers.
The first four people are under client 2467, with January 20–December 31, 2026 dates. Carter is under client 2468, February 8–December 31, 2026. Five distinct filer IDs.
View 5 verified names
Dan Huberty
Ginger Murray
Kentsey Smith Gomez
Larry W. Taylor
Janis L. Carter
Still to verify
The second client label is truncated in the report. Firm assignments and a complete affiliate search remain unverified.
Use registrations to identify a public representation footprint and questions for Government Affairs. A larger count does not automatically justify more sales investment. State funding, product eligibility, buyer authority, and procurement timing still determine the opportunity.