← Pearson perspective

Public evidence · September 12, 2026

Pearson people & state presence

Registered representation, advertised responsibilities, and the questions to validate inside Pearson.

A documented baseline, with clear limits.

Initial review of ten Priority 1 states; counts cover matched Pearson-named clients, not an exhaustive audit of all affiliates or employees. Lobbyist registration does not establish an employee relationship, CTE assignment, access to a legislator, or revenue opportunity.

Priority 1 states first

Four states have verified individual counts within matched client records. Indiana has a dated firm listing. Two searches found no Pearson-named match, and three remain unresolved. These evidence colors are independent of the map’s opportunity tiers.

Dated record

Indiana

—Individual count unverified

Client searched / listed: Pearson Education, Inc.

The January 16 employer list identifies one firm, The Corydon Group, LLC; the compensated list corroborates the client. Bria Riepe is an employer contact and is not counted as a lobbyist.

Documented firm: The Corydon Group, LLC

Still to verify

This dated listing does not establish September status or how many individual firm members represent Pearson.

Indiana — employer lobbyist list ↗January 16, 2026; page 58

Indiana — compensated lobbyist list ↗2026 list; Corydon Group entry, pages 48–49

How to use these findings

Use registrations to identify a public representation footprint and questions for Government Affairs. A larger count does not automatically justify more sales investment. State funding, product eligibility, buyer authority, and procurement timing still determine the opportunity.

Explore the documented team structure →